On 01/14/2014 10:58 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:10:28AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Quite frankly I would be much happier if we didn't stash so much under >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu ... quite frankly it feels like almost *anything* >> could go under there. The microcode code, for example, could go under >> its own subtree. > > Yeah, about the microcode, shouldn't it be under kernel/cpu/? My train > of thought is: because it is cpu-related functionality, it logically > belongs there. arch/x86/cpu/microcode seems clean. I'm wondering if what is mostly currently in arch/x86/kernel/cpu should be mostly in something like arch/x86/cpu/init. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|