On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:45:25 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:37:04AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > This also wasn't the last version of the patch, I distinctly remember > you making me update some documentation crap. Hmm, the later patches must be lost in my INBOX, which I'm currently trying to get back under control. > > Simply because I find switch statements easier to read than else if > > statements. > > Sure whatever your code ;-), but says he who wrote: > > hardsoft_irq = > (hardirq && softirq) ? 'H' : > hardirq ? 'h' : > softirq ? 's' : > '.'; Hehe, I like that better that else if too :-) > > Just apply the later patch and change it however you like. Sure, but it still needs to go in with the sched code, as its dependent on new functions that I don't have. Just add my Acked-by: and I'll clean it up in 3.13. Thanks! -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|