* Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:28 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/14/2013 07:19 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> My guess is that the 95 addresses are randomized and the 82 address is an address which failed to relocate. > > > >> ffffffff82a04a58 is: > >> ffffffff82a03000 t init_per_cpu__gdt_page > > > > > > Specifically, it looks like the percpu stuff isn't getting set up correctly. > > It wouldn't surprise me if there are even more percpu things to fix. > It's the main area we've continued to trip over while working on this > with various linkers. Which linker and version are you seeing this > with? The failure I saw triggered with fairly modern userspace: GNU ld version 2.23.52.0.1-9.fc19 20130226 gcc version 4.8.1 20130603 (Red Hat 4.8.1-1) (GCC) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|