On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:51:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> That message was cool and interesting back in the days when we wrote
> lockdep ('hey, look ma, it really works!!'), but there hasn't been
> any breakage in that area for a long time and it definitely does not
> deserve one line of log spam per CPU! Especially if it messes up such
> a nice CPU bootup table.
Right. The comment in alternatives_enable_smp() talks about older
binutils and could be a useful info if we encounter the issue again. Should I
keep it or are we talking really old, i.e.
obsolete-we-will-never-use-them-anywhere-and-if-someone-does-we-dont-care
binutils?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|