On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:19:32AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote: >> Can you point to any code that is fixed by the commit? > > I have some, but I don't think a lot of people use it. > > Would you be ok with something like the below? It should preserve > functionality for code that only cares about cap_usr_rdpmc (PAPI). > > Stephane, does libpfm use any of these? > Yes, there is an example using this. Need to verify it is not broken currently (self_count.c). > --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h > @@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ struct perf_event_mmap_page { > union { > __u64 capabilities; > struct { > - __u64 cap_usr_time : 1, > - cap_usr_rdpmc : 1, > + __u64 cap_usr_rdpmc : 1, > + cap_usr_time : 1, > cap_usr_time_zero : 1, > cap_____res : 61; > }; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html