On 7/25/13 6:31 AM, Vince Weaver wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote:I didn't add any fields, this is simply catching up with what was already there. But yes, this is very much intended to be compatible.So those id fields have been there since 2.6.31 and just no one noticed the header file comments were wrong? That's fine then, I just have a lot of code and other documentation that needs to be updated then.
I believe those fields came in with the sample_id_all patch - c980d1091810df13f21aabbce545fd98f545bbf7 - which is 2.6.37.
David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html