[tip:core/rcu] rcu: Eliminate check_for_new_grace_period() wrapper function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Commit-ID:  63274cfb94aac109fc2490a70a96b26751608e57
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/63274cfb94aac109fc2490a70a96b26751608e57
Author:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:21:29 -0700
Committer:  Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:39:44 -0700

rcu: Eliminate check_for_new_grace_period() wrapper function

One of the calls to check_for_new_grace_period() is now redundant due to
an immediately preceding call to note_gp_changes().  Eliminating this
redundant call leaves a single caller, which is simpler if inlined.
This commit therefore eliminates the redundant call and inlines the
body of check_for_new_grace_period() into the single remaining call site.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c | 25 +++----------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index ac8f03c..b730149 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1308,26 +1308,6 @@ static void note_gp_changes(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 }
 
 /*
- * Did someone else start a new RCU grace period start since we last
- * checked?  Update local state appropriately if so.  Must be called
- * on the CPU corresponding to rdp.
- */
-static int
-check_for_new_grace_period(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	local_irq_save(flags);
-	if (rdp->gpnum != rsp->gpnum) {
-		note_gp_changes(rsp, rdp);
-		ret = 1;
-	}
-	local_irq_restore(flags);
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/*
  * Do per-CPU grace-period initialization for running CPU.  The caller
  * must hold the lock of the leaf rcu_node structure corresponding to
  * this CPU.
@@ -1749,8 +1729,10 @@ static void
 rcu_check_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
 	/* If there is now a new grace period, record and return. */
-	if (check_for_new_grace_period(rsp, rdp))
+	if (rdp->gpnum != rsp->gpnum) {
+		note_gp_changes(rsp, rdp);
 		return;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Does this CPU still need to do its part for current grace period?
@@ -2302,7 +2284,6 @@ static void __call_rcu_core(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
 
 		/* Are we ignoring a completed grace period? */
 		note_gp_changes(rsp, rdp);
-		check_for_new_grace_period(rsp, rdp);
 
 		/* Start a new grace period if one not already started. */
 		if (!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux