On 12/19/2012 03:30 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 03:17:59PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:I presume with "too big" he really means "oddly shaped".Yeah, that's why it could be enlarged a little in order to adjust it to the MTRR scheme. This is what the BKDG says about it:
Yes, they should just cap the hole a few megabytes short and put an UC MTRR at 0xfc00000000. That should happen regardless... this system is dangerous without it.
-hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|