Re: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update ucode on Intel's CPU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:25 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The problem is that before we have awareness of the memory map, we need to
> map things in order to access them.  This is a big problem and right now
> there are ridiculous heuristics.  I have been working on mapping on demand,
> but there are concerns about the boundaries (i.e. what happens if the
> mapping spill over into a pit like this.)
>
> This kind of stuff is really not acceptable.  A region which will cause
> malfunction if prefetched should not be WB in the MTRR system (I include
> TOM* in that.)  The real question is what we can do to mitigate the damage.

on demand to only map 2M will help ?
or have to return to v6 version for-x86-boot ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux