On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:48 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/18/2012 03:55 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:24 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Something like this works for you? >>> >>> Note: we should promote __compat_[us]64 to a global type when we do the >>> cleanup work requested by Linus (change __[us]64 to explicitly aligned >>> types, with all users that require the old types using __compat_[us]64), >>> but we need the compiler warning to do that, realistically. >>> >> >> Can we also align struct siginfo to 8byte for x32? >> > > We could. If we want to align the substructures then we need some major > surgery to the compat_siginfo handling though. > Since there will be no x32 kernel, align struct siginfo to 8byte for x32 will only be for user space code. It shouldn't be a problem for kernel. -- H.J. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html