* Nick Bowler <nbowler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Your original patch did two things. Peter did the sensible > > thing: he split out the print_kernel_ident() changes from > > your patch which stand on their own and kept your authorship > > in place - that is what the above patch does. > > In which case, the changelog should have been amended to state > that it's a modification of Ben's original submission. Which is what i said in my reply to Alan: | What Peter probably could have done is to add one more line | before his SOB: | | [ split out the patch from the original submission ] | Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | | Otherwise Ben Hutchings's objection here makes little sense. No line of code was added by Peter - it's all Ben's changes. Note that the commit in question: fbdc4b9a6c29: lockdep, rtmutex, bug: Show taint flags on error is actually a good one and i think even Ben actually thinks those changes are good. Nothing was added - Ben only wants *more* to be done in a single patch and is being silly about the SOB and is asking it to be removed. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|