* Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:48:51 +0100 > Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 15:34 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > If you disagree with a patch, do not silently drop parts > > > of it. I demand that you remove my 'Signed-off-by' as > > > this is not the change I submitted. > > > > The easy solution is that I never take patches from you > > again, ever. Consider that done. I'll let Ingo see if he can > > remove your SOB. > > In which case you are presumably ceasing to be a maintainer > for that code ? Your statement above appears to be > inconsistent with the rôle of a maintainer. What Peter did was rather sensible: he split a patch that did two things into two and applied one standalone, uncontroversial half of it and kept the part of the part of the changelog that related to that change. What Peter probably could have done is to add one more line before his SOB: [ split out the patch from the original submission ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Otherwise Ben Hutchings's objection here makes little sense. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|