Re: [tip:perf/urgent] perf tools, x86: Fix 32-bit compile on 64-bit system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/21/2011 08:36 AM, tip-bot for David Ahern wrote:
> Commit-ID:  08a4a43fc407d780bdde36d98f89c0dbb2a6be6b
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/08a4a43fc407d780bdde36d98f89c0dbb2a6be6b
> Author:     David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:38:24 -0600
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> CommitDate: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:42:30 +0200
> 
> perf tools, x86: Fix 32-bit compile on 64-bit system
> 
> Builds for 32-bit perf binaries on a 64-bit host currently fail
> with this error:
> 
>  [...]
>  bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S: Assembler messages:
>  bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:29: Error: bad register name `%rdi'
>  bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:34: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `movs'
>  bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:50: Error: bad register name `%rdi'
>  bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:61: Error: bad register name `%rdi'
>  ...
> 
> The problem is the detection of the host arch without considering passed in
> flags. This change fixes 32-bit builds via:
> 
> make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-m32
> 
> and 64-bit builds still reference the memcpy_64.S.
> 

But this is the wrong way to build 32-bit code on 64-bit platforms.
make ARCH=i386 is the supported way.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux