Re: [tip:sched/locking] sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip:sched/locking] sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock()
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:50:40 +0900
- Cc: Arne Jansen <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, efault@xxxxxx, npiggin@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, frank.rowand@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1307225323.2497.730.camel@laptop>
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yeah, that wants a whole lot of reverting, from the offending commit up
> to and including 317f394160e9beb97d19a84c39b7e5eb3d7815a8.
Mind sending one single tested patch? I still get conflicts, even just
trying to revert the last of those (ie 317f394160e9) due to all the
other scheduler changes..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]