On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 17:31, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 17:17 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> >> If you think that needs to change, please discuss/provide >> alternatives, which we can check if they sufficiently work for us, >> like we did with this patch. > > Since this is a published interface that's not the way things work, > first thing is to revert this to avoid us getting stuck with this crap. What? That is not merged. Anything that would need fixing can still be fixed. But I guess you need to do more than just calling it 'crap'. >> But please stop rhetorically asking me if I want a slower kernel, and >> chance your tone. That will get us nowhere. > > Ah, we've got our patch and we'll stick to it no matter what the > consequences, > very good attitude that. It's not my patch. I just like its interface very much. Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|