* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 14:19 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 13:16 +0000, tip-bot for Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Commit-ID: 14bc7a06c6175cfa8070a5f5022210b648c3e0a7 > > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/14bc7a06c6175cfa8070a5f5022210b648c3e0a7 > > > Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > AuthorDate: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:56:14 -0500 > > > Committer: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > CommitDate: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:46:59 -0500 > > > > > > tracing: Only trace sched_wakeup if it actually work something up > > > > > > Currently the tracepoint sched_wakeup traces the wakeup event even > > > if the wakeup failed to wake anything up. This is quite stupid > > > but it happens because we did not want to add a conditional > > > to the core kernel code that would just slow down the wakeup events. > > > > > > This patch changes the wakeup tracepoints to use the > > > > > > DEFINE_EVENT_CONDITIONAL() > > > > > > to test the "success" parameter and will only trace the event if > > > the wakeup was successfull. > > > > > > The success field in the tracepoint is removed since it is no > > > longer needed. > > > > I NAKed this, its stupid. > > I wouldn't call it stupid, but unnecessary, yes. > > Anyway, it was the last patch of the series. > > Ingo, can you revert this last patch? Yeah, done. Thanks guys, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|