On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 01:17 +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Of course the really interesting question is whether this sparse irq > rework allows us to hang our extra per-irq information of the irq_data > structure now, rather than having to maintain all these auxiliary > arrays? On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 03:01 +0100, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > It should. I'm about to followup with an initial stab at some cleanups which are made possible by these core changes, including hanging the per-irq info off the handler_data. These patches are on top of recent Linus master tree plus Konrad's swiotlb-xen tree and Stefano's PVHVM tree since the latter in particular touches the same area. Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|