On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 08:37 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > So, you say below that it works because synchronize_srcu(), that > > waits for qs after touching pmus, implies synchronize_sched(), right? > > Ook... My current plans to fold SRCU into TREE_RCU would invalidate > this assumption. > > Maybe we need some sort of primitive that concurrently waits for > multiple types of RCU grace periods? Nah, but I was thinking that any kind of preemptible rcu sync would imply a sched rcu sync. If not strictly implied I'd have no problem simply writing: synchronize_rcu_sched(); synchronize_srcu(); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|