Has this patch been posted to the 2.6.35 kernel also, or just to 2.6.36? I don't think it's been posted to 2.6.35 where the problem it corrects was introduced. "Greg KH" <gregkh@xxxxxxx> has made a last call (tomorrow - Aug 20) for chnges for 2.6.35.3 and doesn't seem to have this. It's not in the prior two updates either..... --- On Wed, 8/11/10, tip-bot for Luca Barbieri <luca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Commit-ID: 30246557a06bb20618bed906a06d1e1e0faa8bb4 > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/30246557a06bb20618bed906a06d1e1e0faa8bb4 > Author: Luca Barbieri <luca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > AuthorDate: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 04:04:38 +0200 > Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> > CommitDate: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:03:28 -0700 > > x86, asm: Refactor atomic64_386_32.S to support old > binutils and be cleaner > > The old code didn't work on binutils 2.12 because setting a symbol to > a register apparently requires a fairly recent version. > > ... > > This fixes kernel bugzilla 16506. ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|