On 08/06/2010 06:08 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> I'm not sure the above is decipherable. Please provide an incremental >> patch with a more detailed description. > > YH was saying I overoptimized, and it looks like he is right, > although there are only one or two machines in existence that > are likely to be affected. > > Untested patch to remove the cleverness below. It it boots all > is well. > This makes sense to me. Yinghai, do you have a system that is actually affected, and if so, could you test this patch? -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|