Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 13:57 -0700, H. Peter Anvin a écrit : > On 05/18/2010 01:10 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > # gcc -v > > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/specs > > Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man > > --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix > > --disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit > > --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-java-awt=gtk > > --host=i386-redhat-linux > > Thread model: posix > > gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-10) > > I just implemented a fallback for gcc 3, but the real question is to > which degree we still care about gcc 3 support for x86 specifically > (other architectures might have other needs, but this is x86-specific code.) > > Lately the number of issues with gcc 3 support seems to have gone way > up, and at some point we're going to have to cut it loose -- when would > depend largely on what the usage case is; e.g. why are you, yourself, > using gcc 3.4 to compile a state of the art kernel? I use many different machines to compile kernels, and found this one using gcc-3.4.6, but still running original 2.6.9.something RHEL kernel ;) For kernels I actually boot, I use gcc-4.5, 4.4.x, 4.3.x, 4.2.x, 4.1.2 (cross compiler) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |