On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 15:50 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 09:48:15AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > pr_info("event trace: Could not activate trace point " \
> > > - "probe to " #call "\n"); \
> > > + "probe to %s\n", #call); \
> > This reduces format string space a bit, but doesn't it just add another
> > string to the string tables #func == "func" as well as add code to pass
> > in another parameter?
> Yeah, I don't understand the purpose of this patch either...
The patch from Li Zefan you've already queued is better
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/13/60
Subject: [PATCH 03/13] tracing: Move a printk out of ftrace_raw_reg_event_foo()
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:08:04 +0100
From: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Move the printk from each ftrace_raw_reg_event_foo() to
its caller ftrace_event_enable_disable(). This avoids each
regfunc trace event callbacks to handle a same error report
that can be carried from the caller.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|