On 12/02/2009 04:25 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Avi Kivity<avi@xxxxxxxxxx> 02.12.09 15:12>>>Wouldn't 'u8 ret', as an additional argument be sufficient? gcc still ought to be able to use the same register for new and ret if we remove the early clobber.We can't (validly) remove the early-clobber, otherwise the compiler would be permitted to use a register also used for addressing the lock structure for "new".
I meant for 'ret'. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|