On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:16 +0000, tip-bot for Ingo Molnar wrote: > Commit-ID: 091ad3658e3c76c5fb05f65bfb64a0246f8f31b5 > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/091ad3658e3c76c5fb05f65bfb64a0246f8f31b5 > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> > AuthorDate: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:04:55 +0100 > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> > CommitDate: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:04:55 +0100 > > events: Rename TRACE_EVENT_TEMPLATE() to DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS() > > It is not quite obvious at first sight what TRACE_EVENT_TEMPLATE > does: does it define an event as well beyond defining a template? > > To clarify this, rename it to DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS, which follows > the various 'DECLARE_*()' idioms we already have in the kernel: > > DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(class) > > DEFINE_EVENT(class, event1) > DEFINE_EVENT(class, event2) > DEFINE_EVENT(class, event3) > > To complete this logic we should also rename TRACE_EVENT() to: > > DEFINE_SINGLE_EVENT(single_event) > > ... but in a more quiet moment of the kernel cycle. I would like to hear what others think about this change before we go ahead and implement it. A lot of developers have just learned about TRACE_EVENT and now it just disappeared. Well, not really, but in the sense of ' find linux.git -name '*.[ch]' | xargs grep TRACE_EVENT' it no longer exists. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|