* Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:34:16 GMT tip-bot for Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Commit-ID: 55621ccf2b7a8afe39df8c80f55b28424fd07d13 > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/55621ccf2b7a8afe39df8c80f55b28424fd07d13 > > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> > > AuthorDate: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:57:25 +0200 > > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> > > CommitDate: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:00:27 +0200 > > > > perf tools: Fix the NO_64BIT build on pure 64-bit systems > > > > Randy Dunlap reported that 'make NO_64BIT=1' fails to build > > a pure 32-b it binary on 64-bit/64-bit x86 systems. > > > > The reason is that we dont pass in the -m32 and GCC defaults > > to -m64. > > > > So pass it in - and also extend the warning message about libelf > > dependencies - glibc-dev[el] is needed as well beyond the libelf > > library. > > Ingo, thanks, I finally got this working, after installing more 32-bit > libs etc., like Kyle said that I would need to do. > > The error message is still a little misleading/confusing: > Makefile:426: *** No libelf.h/libelf found, please install libelf-dev/elfutils-libelf-devel and glibc-dev[el]. Stop. > > when elfutils-libelf-devel.i586 is installed but glibc-devel.i[56]86 is not > installed. gcc failed with: > In file included from /usr/include/features.h:376, > from /usr/include/sys/types.h:27, > from /usr/include/libelf.h:53, > from elfdeveltest.c:1: > /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or directory Why is it misleading? It says it very clearly that you need to install both: please install libelf-dev/elfutils-libelf-devel and glibc-dev[el]. Stop. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|