On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 15:10 +0000, tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Commit-ID: 182a85f8a119c789610a9d464f4129ded9f3c107 > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/182a85f8a119c789610a9d464f4129ded9f3c107 > Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> > AuthorDate: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:24:49 +0200 > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> > CommitDate: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:44:33 +0200 > > sched: Disable wakeup balancing > > Sysbench thinks SD_BALANCE_WAKE is too agressive and kbuild doesn't > really mind too much, SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE picks up most of the > slack. > > On a dual socket, quad core, dual thread nehalem system: > > sysbench (--num_threads=16): > > SD_BALANCE_WAKE-: 13982 tx/s > SD_BALANCE_WAKE+: 15688 tx/s I got the + and - confused it seems.. sysbench is faster without BALANCE_WAKE. > kbuild (-j16): > > SD_BALANCE_WAKE-: 47.648295846 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.312% ) > SD_BALANCE_WAKE+: 47.608607360 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.026% ) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|