* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> 25.08.09 16:14 >>> > > > >* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> 25.08.09 15:56 >>> > >> >Would it be possible to split it into two pieces: 'minimal fix' and > >> >'clean up' portions? > >> > >> Besides being cumbersome, that would make it even larger, so I'd > >> say that's not worth it. > > > >I mean the two patches yield the same end result. The first one > > I also understood it that way. > > >(which is smaller, hopefully) gets committed to x86/urgent, the > >second one (the cleanups and other non-essentials) gets pushed > >upstream in .32. > > The cleanup part really isn't much more than what I described with > "Once touching this code, also use the various data section helper > macros from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h.", and if the first > patch wouldn't use those macros, it would just grow and become > even less readable. fair enough. Lets hope it all goes fine. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|