Re: [tip:timers/core] x86: Do not unregister PIT clocksource on PIT oneshot setup/shutdown

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:35:41 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> even after this fix, -tip testing found yet another circular locking 
> bug, on a 32-bit Core2 laptop:

You got to love lockdep .. another ugly one:
clocksource_register: has clocksource_mutex, get cpu_add_remove_lock
native_cpu_up: has cpu_add_remove_lock, get clocksource_mutex

To register a clocksource the clocksource_mutex is acquired and if
necessary timekeeping_notify is called to install the clocksource as
the timekeeper clock. timekeeping_notify uses stop_machine which needs
to take cpu_add_remove_lock mutex.
Starting a new cpu is done with the cpu_add_remove_lock mutex held.
native_cpu_up checks the tsc of the new cpu and if the tsc is no good
clocksource_change_rating is called. Which needs the clocksource_mutex
and the deadlock is complete.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux