Re: [tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Increase granularity of read_persistent_clock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > FYI, -tip arch-testing found that this commit broke the PowerPC 
> > build:
> > 
> > /home/mingo/tip/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c: In function 'read_persistent_clock':
> > /home/mingo/tip/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:788: error: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
> > /home/mingo/tip/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:791: error: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
> > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/time.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
> 
> I overlooked a case in the powerpc version of read_persistent_lock.
> New patch:

the patches are already committed and this patch doesnt apply - mind 
sending a delta fix against tip:master:

 http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux