On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:19:23PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:16:21PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > +static inline void x2apic_force_phys()
> > > +{
> > > +}
> >
> > Sigh. Have you tested this patche and have you looked at the
> > resultig compiler output?
> >
> I haven't looked and compiler output. What is wrong with it?
> Is defining this function as #define would be batter?
>
Actually I made it a define initially and tested with it. Later I change
it to be inline and apparently tested only with x2apic enabled. I see the
problem now. Do you want it to be define or properly defined empty inline
function like any other function in this code?
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|