On 08/03/2009 08:11 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>>>
>> OK, I spotted the following error, which certainly would explain a crash on
>> an APM machine:
>>
>> /* data */
>> - [GDT_ENTRY_APMBIOS_BASE+2] = { { { 0x0000ffff, 0x00409200 } }
>> },
>> + [GDT_ENTRY_APMBIOS_BASE+2] = GDT_ENTRY_INIT(0x409a, 0, 0xffff),
>
> Oops, I really should have checked the binary because the compiler should
> generate same code with this patch.
>
Well, it doesn't even on the best of days, because the last hunk changes
a dynamic initializer to a strange mix between static and dynamic:
-static struct desc_struct bad_bios_desc;
+static struct desc_struct bad_bios_desc = GDT_ENTRY_INIT(0x4092, 0, 0);
/*
* At some point we want to use this stack frame pointer to unwind
@@ -476,9 +476,6 @@ void pnpbios_calls_init(union
pnp_bios_install_struct *header)
pnp_bios_callpoint.offset = header->fields.pm16offset;
pnp_bios_callpoint.segment = PNP_CS16;
- bad_bios_desc.a = 0;
- bad_bios_desc.b = 0x00409200;
-
set_desc_base(&bad_bios_desc, (unsigned long)__va(0x40UL << 4));
set_desc_limit(&bad_bios_desc, 4095 - (0x40 << 4));
This is about at strange as it comes; I think we could simply do:
GDT_ENTRY_INIT(0x4092, (unsigned long)__va(0x400UL), 4095-0x400);
Although perhaps the 4095 should really be PAGE_SIZE-1...
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|