Ingo Molnar wrote: > * tip-bot for Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Commit-ID: 4b05c392955458757790414bd7ba4280e1a515b0 >> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/4b05c392955458757790414bd7ba4280e1a515b0 >> Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> >> AuthorDate: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:10:56 -0700 >> Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> >> CommitDate: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:53:15 -0700 >> >> x86: add boundary check for 32bit res before expand e820 resource to alignment >> >> Avoid incorrect address arithmetic, ascerbated by previous improper >> definition of the round_up() macro. >> >> fix hang with HIGHMEM_64G and 32bit resource. >> according to hpa and Linus, use (resource_size_t)-1 to fend off big ranges. >> analyized by hpa >> >> Alex found: >> for i386 machine the specjbb2005 still can not run with hugepage >> >> -v2: it also fix hugepage problem >> >> Reported-and-tested-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@xxxxxxxx> >> Reported-and-Tested-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> > > Peter, Yinghi - i zapped this and the other e820 patch from > x86/urgent as Linus already applied slightly different versions > upstream: > > 7c5371c: x86: add boundary check for 32bit res before expand e820 resource to alignment the same, only comments is different. > 4364467: x86: fix power-of-2 round_up/round_down macros more safe. do we need to move it include/linux/kernel.h ? YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|