Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: x86: Fix call-chain support to use NMI-safe methods

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The GUP based method is pretty generic though - and can be used on 
> other architectures as well. It's not as fast as direct access 
> though.

Another question is: your patch switches over all normal exceptions 
from IRET to hand-unroll+RET.

It would be really nice to benchmark it (via 'perf stat' for example 
;-) whether that's a slowdown or a speedup.

If it's a slowdown then the decision is easy: we dont want this, we 
want to push the overhead into the sampling code, away from common 
codepaths.

[ If on the other hand it's a speedup of a few cycles then we have 
  the problem of me suddenly liking this patch a whole lot more ;-) ]

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux