* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > - return hard_smp_processor_id() >> index_msb; > + return initial_apic_id >> index_msb; > - unsigned apicid = hard_smp_processor_id(); > + unsigned apicid = cpu_has_apic ? hard_smp_processor_id() : c->apicid; > - int apicid = hard_smp_processor_id(); > + int apicid = cpu_has_apic ? hard_smp_processor_id() : c->apicid; Doesnt such a pattern call for the pushing of that distinction into hard_smp_processor_id() instead? (after a careful review of all hard_smp_processor_id() call-sites) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|