On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Eric Miao wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Commit-ID: 044d408409cc4e1bc75c886e27ca85c270db104c > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/044d408409cc4e1bc75c886e27ca85c270db104c > > Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> > > AuthorDate: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:13:32 +0100 > > Commit: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> > > CommitDate: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:05:45 +0100 > > > > genirq: assert that irq handlers are indeed running in hardirq context > > > > Make sure the genirq layer handlers are indeed running handlers > > in hardirq context. That is the genirq expectation and doing > > anything else is broken. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > LKML-Reference: <1236006812.5330.632.camel@laptop> > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> > > > > OK, now this gave me the warning below and it looks resend_irqs() > and resend_tasklet are somehow found guilty and doing wrong, as > the comment of this commit suggested, yet I'm not sure if this makes > sense: No, it doesn't. We didn't think about the resend tasklet. I'm going to fix it. Thanks, tglx
|