Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] net: stmmac: fix resume failures due to RX clock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:30:53AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> On 27/02/2025 14:37, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This series is likely dependent on the "net: stmmac: cleanup transmit
> > clock setting" series which was submitted earlier today.
> 
> I tested this series without the above on top of mainline and I still saw
> some issues with suspend. However, when testing this on top of -next (which
> has the referenced series) it works like a charm. So yes it does appear to
> be dependent indeed.
> 
> I have tested this on Tegra186, Tegra194 and Tegra234 with -next and all are
> working fine. So with that feel free to add my ...
> 
> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Jon,

I came up with an alternative approach which should make this safer -
for example, if the PHY remains linked with the partner over an
ifdown or module remove/re-insert.

Please see v2 of "net: stmmac: approach 2 to solve EEE LPI reset
issues" which replaces this series.

https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z8m-CRucPxDW5zZK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux