Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/230] 6.12.16-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2025-02-19 14:32, Jon Hunter wrote:

On 19/02/2025 13:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 01:12:41PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
Hi Greg,

On 19/02/2025 13:10, Jon Hunter wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:25:17 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.16 release.
There are 230 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:25:11 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
    https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.16-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

Failures detected for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.12:
      10 builds:    10 pass, 0 fail
      26 boots:    26 pass, 0 fail
      116 tests:    115 pass, 1 fail

Linux version:    6.12.16-rc1-gcf505a9aecb7
Boards tested:    tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                  tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                  tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                  tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Test failures:    tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh


The following appear to have crept in again ...

Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
     sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug

Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
     sched/deadline: Correctly account for allocated bandwidth during hotplug

Yes, but all of them are there this time.  Are you saying none should be
there?  Does 6.14-rc work for you with these targets?

The 1st one definitely shouldn't. That one is still under debug for
v6.14 [0]. I can try reverting only that one and seeing if it now
passes with the 2nd.
Most certainly not - you need all three or none:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/905eb8ab-2635-e030-b671-ab045b55f24c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/ba51a43f-796d-4b79-808a-b8185905638a@xxxxxxxxxx/

I was about to link to that.. please try 6.14-rc and see if it works for you.

Alternatively we should remove the whole series again because it's obvious that
_something_ is still wrong somewhere. Maybe something specific to Tegra's topology?

-h




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux