On 13/12/2024 12:37, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof!
>
> On 13/12/2024 11:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/12/2024 22:11, Brad Griffis wrote:
>>> For interrupt-map entries, the DTS specification requires
>>> that #address-cells is defined for both the child node and the
>>> interrupt parent. For the PCIe interrupt-map entries, the parent
>>> node ("gic") has not specified #address-cells. The existing layout
>>> of the PCIe interrupt-map entries indicates that it assumes
>>> that #address-cells is zero for this node.
>>>
>>> Explicitly set #address-cells to zero for "gic" so that it complies
>>> with the device tree specification.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Brad Griffis <bgriffis@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>
>> So entire nvidia works on old kernel and sends patches rebased on old
>> kernel? Please start working on mainline.
>
>
> You know that is not the case! Yes there may be a few cases of people
> using your old email, but not all of us :-)
Yeah, that was just an assumption, but three independent people are
Ccing address which does not exist in the kernel and it is impossible to
get/deduce/invent. Three patchsets from three different people...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
