> -----Original Message----- > From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2024 8:19 AM > To: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx; robin.murphy@xxxxxxx; > catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; linux-arm- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jon Hunter > <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Vikram Sethi <vsethi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rich Wiley > <rwiley@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bob Knight <rknight@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: arm_cspmu: nvidia: update CNVLINK PMU > events > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 09:58:45PM +0000, Besar Wicaksono wrote: > > Rename loc* and rem* events in CNVLINK PMU to cmem* and gmem* > events. > > > > Signed-off-by: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.c > b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.c > > index ea2d44adfa7c..d1cd9975e71a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.c > > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/nvidia_cspmu.c > > @@ -112,6 +112,25 @@ static struct attribute *mcf_pmu_event_attrs[] = { > > NULL, > > }; > > > > +static struct attribute *mcf_cnvlink_pmu_event_attrs[] = { > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_bytes_cmem, 0x0), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_bytes_gmem, 0x1), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_bytes_cmem, 0x2), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_bytes_gmem, 0x3), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(total_bytes_cmem, 0x4), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(total_bytes_gmem, 0x5), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_req_cmem, 0x6), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_req_gmem, 0x7), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_req_cmem, 0x8), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_req_gmem, 0x9), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(total_req_cmem, 0xa), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(total_req_gmem, 0xb), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_cum_outs_cmem, 0xc), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_cum_outs_gmem, 0xd), > > + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(cycles, > ARM_CSPMU_EVT_CYCLES_DEFAULT), > > + NULL, > > +}; > > + > > static struct attribute *generic_pmu_event_attrs[] = { > > ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(cycles, > ARM_CSPMU_EVT_CYCLES_DEFAULT), > > NULL, > > @@ -234,7 +253,7 @@ static const struct nv_cspmu_match > nv_cspmu_match[] = { > > .filter_default_val = NV_CNVL_FILTER_ID_MASK, > > .name_pattern = "nvidia_cnvlink_pmu_%u", > > .name_fmt = NAME_FMT_SOCKET, > > - .event_attr = mcf_pmu_event_attrs, > > + .event_attr = mcf_cnvlink_pmu_event_attrs, > > .format_attr = cnvlink_pmu_format_attrs > > }, > > Hmm. Isn't this a user-visible change? For example, will scripts driving > 'perf' with the old event names continue to work after this patch? > Yes this is user visible. I am expecting user script to be updated accordingly. Would this be reasonable? Regards, Besar