Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/482] 6.10.14-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/10/2024 11:40, Jon Hunter wrote:

On 09/10/2024 22:59, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 14:01:03 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.14 release.
There are 482 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:55:15 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
    https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.14-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.10:
   10 builds:    10 pass, 0 fail
   26 boots:    26 pass, 0 fail
   116 tests:    116 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:    6.10.14-rc1-gd44129966591
Boards tested:    tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
               tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
               tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
               tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>

Did this one not fail on the same cgroup issue as 6.11? we had the
offending commit in all trees.


I did not see any failure there. However, same tests are run and so it should have. I can run it again to double check.


I doubled checked and I don't see warning with this kernel. Odd.

Jon

--
nvpublic




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux