Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] net: phy: aquantia: remove usage of phy_set_max_speed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:05:53 -0700
Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Remove the use of phy_set_max_speed in phy driver as the
> function is mainly used in MAC driver to set the max
> speed.
> 
> Instead use get_features to fix up Phy PMA capabilities for
> AQR111, AQR111B0, AQR114C and AQCS109
> 
> Fixes: 038ba1dc4e54 ("net: phy: aquantia: add AQR111 and AQR111B0 PHY ID")
> Fixes: 0974f1f03b07 ("net: phy: aquantia: remove false 5G and 10G speed ability for AQCS109")
> Fixes: c278ec644377 ("net: phy: aquantia: add support for AQR114C PHY ID")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240913011635.1286027-1-quic_abchauha@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@xxxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

> +static int aqr111_get_features(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +	unsigned long *supported = phydev->supported;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Normal feature discovery */
> +	ret = genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities(phydev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* PHY FIXUP */
> +	/* Although the PHY sets bit 12.18.19, it does not support 10G modes */
> +	linkmode_clear_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> +	linkmode_clear_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseKX4_Full_BIT, supported);
> +	linkmode_clear_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseKR_Full_BIT, supported);
> +
> +	/* Phy supports Speeds up to 5G with Autoneg though the phy PMA says otherwise */
> +	linkmode_or(supported, supported, phy_gbit_features);
> +	/* Set the 5G speed if it wasn't set as part of the PMA feature discovery */
> +	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_5000baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> +	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_2500baseT_Full_BIT, supported);

As you are moving away from phy_set_max_speed(phydev, 5000), it should mean
that what used to be in the supported bits already contained the
5GBaseT bit, as phy_set_max_speed simply clears the highest speeds.

In such case, calling the newly introduced function from
patch 1 should be enough ?

Thanks,

Maxime




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux