On 9/17/2024 1:57 PM, Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) wrote:
>
>
> On 9/17/2024 2:31 AM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 06:35:17PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 09:12:13AM -0700, Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) wrote:
>>>> On 9/13/2024 1:01 AM, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:16:35 -0700
>>>>> Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Recently we observed that aquantia AQR115c always comes up in
>>>>>> 100Mbps mode. AQR115c aquantia chip supports max speed up to
>>>>>> 2.5Gbps. Today the AQR115c configuration is done through
>>>>>> aqr113c_config_init which internally calls aqr107_config_init.
>>>>>> aqr113c and aqr107 are both capable of 10Gbps. Whereas AQR115c
>>>>>> supprts max speed of 2.5Gbps only.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 0ebc581f8a4b ("net: phy: aquantia: add support for aqr115c")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_main.c | 7 +++++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_main.c b/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_main.c
>>>>>> index e982e9ce44a5..9afc041dbb64 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_main.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_main.c
>>>>>> @@ -499,6 +499,12 @@ static int aqr107_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>>>>> if (!ret)
>>>>>> aqr107_chip_info(phydev);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + /* AQR115c supports speed up to 2.5Gbps */
>>>>>> + if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX) {
>>>>>> + phy_set_max_speed(phydev, SPEED_2500);
>>>>>> + phydev->autoneg = AUTONEG_ENABLE;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> If I get your commit log right, the code above will also apply for
>>>>> ASQR107, AQR113 and so on, don't you risk breaking these PHYs if they
>>>>> are in 2500BASEX mode at boot?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking of the same. That this might break something here for other Phy chip.
>>>> As every phy shares the same config init. Hence the reason for RFC.
>>>>
>>>>> Besides that, if the PHY switches between SGMII and 2500BASEX
>>>>> dynamically depending on the link speed, it could be that it's
>>>>> configured by default in SGMII, hence this check will be missed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I think the better way is to have AQR115c its own config_init which sets
>>>> the max speed to 2.5Gbps and then call aqr113c_config_init .
>>>
>>> phy_set_max_speed(phydev, SPEED_2500) is something a MAC does, not a
>>> PHY. It is a way for the MAC to say is supports less than the PHY. I
>>> would say the current aqcs109_config_init() is doing this wrong.
>>
>> Agreed on two points:
>>
>> 1) phy_set_max_speed() is documented as a function that the MAC will
>> call.
>>
>> 2) calling phy_set_max_speed() in .config_init() is way too late for
>> phylink. .config_init() is called from phy_init_hw(), which happens
>> after the PHY has been attached. However, phylink needs to know what
>> the PHY supports _before_ that, especially for any PHY that is on a
>> SFP, so it can determine what interface to use for the PHY.
>>
>> So, as Andrew says, the current aqcs109_config_init(), and it seems
>> aqr111_config_init() are both broken.
>>
>> The PHY driver needs to indicate to phylib what is supported by the
>> PHY no later than the .get_features() method.
>>
>
> Noted!. Makes sense. thanks for your review, Russell.
> We are in the process of figuring out what the phy chip is reporting as
> its features. Once done i will raise a clean patch for upstream review.
>
Russell and Andrew
we added prints and understood what the phy is reporting as part of the
genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities
[ 12.041576] MDIO_STAT2: 0xb301
[ 12.050722] MDIO_PMA_EXTABLE: 0x40fc
