Re: [PATCH V4] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Optimise non-coherent unmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Btw, this seems to be causing iommu faults for me for what (according
to a sw pgtable walk) should be a valid mapping, indicating
missing/incomplete tlb invalidation.  This is with drm/msm (which
probably matters, since it implements it's own iommu_flush_ops) on
x1e80100 (which probably doesn't matter.. but it is an mmu-500 in case
it does).

I _think_ what is causing this is the change in ordering of
__arm_lpae_clear_pte() (dma_sync_single_for_device() on the pgtable
memory) and io_pgtable_tlb_flush_walk().  I'm not entirely sure how
this patch is supposed to work correctly in the face of other
concurrent translations (to buffers unrelated to the one being
unmapped(), because after the io_pgtable_tlb_flush_walk() we can have
stale data read back into the tlb.

How is this supposed to work?

BR,
-R




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux