On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 05:13, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10-07-24, 15:51, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > I think this should work, but in this case we seem to need a similar > > thing for dev_pm_opp_set_rate(). > > We don't go to that path for genpd's I recall. Do we ? For genpd's, > since there is no freq, we always call _set_opp(). You are right! Although, maybe it's still preferred to do it in _set_opp() as it looks like the code would be more consistent? No? Kind regards Uffe
