How do you think about to use the summary phrase “Fix reference counting for children in mxs_pinctrl_probe_dt()”?
…
> of_get_next_child() will increase refcount …
the reference counter?
> Per current implementation, 'child' will be override by
overridden?
> for_each_child_of_node(np, child), so use of_get_child_count to avoid
> refcount leakage.
Another wording suggestion:
for_each_child_of_node(np, child). Thus use an of_get_child_count() call
to avoid reference counting leakage.
Regards,
Markus
