Hi Thierry,
On 15/03/2024 11:25, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 14/03/2024 15:49, Thierry Reding wrote:
From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
The host1x devices are virtual compound devices and do not perform DMA
accesses themselves, so they do not need to be set up for DMA.
Ideally we would also not need to set up DMA masks for the virtual
devices, but we currently still need those for legacy support on old
hardware.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/host1x/bus.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/bus.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/bus.c
index 783975d1384f..7c52757a89db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/bus.c
@@ -351,11 +351,6 @@ static int host1x_device_uevent(const struct
device *dev,
return 0;
}
-static int host1x_dma_configure(struct device *dev)
-{
- return of_dma_configure(dev, dev->of_node, true);
-}
-
static const struct dev_pm_ops host1x_device_pm_ops = {
.suspend = pm_generic_suspend,
.resume = pm_generic_resume,
@@ -369,7 +364,6 @@ const struct bus_type host1x_bus_type = {
.name = "host1x",
.match = host1x_device_match,
.uevent = host1x_device_uevent,
- .dma_configure = host1x_dma_configure,
.pm = &host1x_device_pm_ops,
};
@@ -458,8 +452,6 @@ static int host1x_device_add(struct host1x *host1x,
device->dev.bus = &host1x_bus_type;
device->dev.parent = host1x->dev;
- of_dma_configure(&device->dev, host1x->dev->of_node, true);
-
device->dev.dma_parms = &device->dma_parms;
dma_set_max_seg_size(&device->dev, UINT_MAX);
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
I don't see this in -next yet?
Ideally, if we don't see any issues with this we should pull this into
v6.8.y stable branch because I am now seeing the warning there. Should
we apply a fixes tag to this?
Thanks
Jon
--
nvpublic
