> >> > Since almost every driver associates the tasklet with the > >> > dma_chan, we could go one step further and add the > >> > work_queue structure directly into struct dma_chan, > >> > with the wrapper operating on the dma_chan rather than > >> > the work_queue. > >> > >> I think that is very great idea. having this wrapped in dma_chan would > >> be very good way as well > >> > >> Am not sure if Allen is up for it :-) > > > > Thanks Arnd, I know we did speak about this at LPC. I did start > > working on using completion. I dropped it as I thought it would > > be easier to move to workqueues. > > It's definitely easier to do the workqueue conversion as a first > step, and I agree adding support for the completion right away is > probably too much. Moving the work_struct into the dma_chan > is probably not too hard though, if you leave your current > approach for the cases where the tasklet is part of the > dma_dev rather than the dma_chan. > Alright, I will work on moving work_struck into the dma_chan and leave the dma_dev as is (using bh workqueues) and post a RFC. Once reviewed, I could move to the next step. Thank you. - Allen
