On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 05:08:48PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 08:53:42PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > core_init() callback is used to notify the EPC initialization event to the
> > EPF drivers. The 'core' prefix was used indicate that the controller IP
> > core has completed initialization. But it serves no purpose as the EPF
> > driver will only care about the EPC initialization as a whole and there is
> > no real benefit to distinguish the IP core part.
> >
> > So let's rename the core_init() callback in 'struct pci_epc_event_ops' to
> > just init() to make it more clear.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > include/linux/pci-epf.h | 4 ++--
> > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > index e5d67aec7574..da894a9a447e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static void pci_epf_mhi_dma_deinit(struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi)
> > epf_mhi->dma_chan_rx = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > -static int pci_epf_mhi_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > +static int pci_epf_mhi_epc_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > {
> > struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
> > const struct pci_epf_mhi_ep_info *info = epf_mhi->info;
> > @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static void pci_epf_mhi_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > }
> >
> > static const struct pci_epc_event_ops pci_epf_mhi_epc_event_ops = {
> > - .core_init = pci_epf_mhi_core_init,
> > + .init = pci_epf_mhi_epc_init,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct pci_epc_bus_event_ops pci_epf_mhi_bus_event_ops = {
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > index 751dab5799d5..1dae0fce8fc4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int pci_epf_test_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > +static int pci_epf_test_epc_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
>
> Why have _epc_ init in the name at all?
>
> Isn't
> static int pci_epf_test_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
>
> Enough?
>
> From my perspective, it is the EPF that is initializing
> (by configuring the BARS according to it's liking),
> not the EPC initializing.
>
Hmm, you are right. It makes sense to remove 'epc' from the naming.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
