On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 7:34 PM Sumit Gupta <sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add support of "Thermal fast Sampling Period (_TFP)" for Passive cooling.
> As per [1], _TFP overrides the "Thermal Sampling Period (_TSP)" if both
> are present in a Thermal zone.
>
> [1] ACPI Specification 6.4 - section 11.4.17. _TFP (Thermal fast Sampling
> Period)"
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> index f74d81abdbfc..3b75eb2260d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ struct acpi_thermal_passive {
> struct acpi_thermal_trip trip;
> unsigned long tc1;
> unsigned long tc2;
> - unsigned long tsp;
> + unsigned long delay;
> };
>
> struct acpi_thermal_active {
> @@ -404,11 +404,17 @@ static bool passive_trip_params_init(struct acpi_thermal *tz)
>
> tz->trips.passive.tc2 = tmp;
>
> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(tz->device->handle, "_TFP", NULL, &tmp);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> + tz->trips.passive.delay = tmp;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(tz->device->handle, "_TSP", NULL, &tmp);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return false;
>
> - tz->trips.passive.tsp = tmp;
> + tz->trips.passive.delay = tmp * 100;
>
> return true;
> }
> @@ -904,7 +910,7 @@ static int acpi_thermal_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>
> acpi_trip = &tz->trips.passive.trip;
> if (acpi_thermal_trip_valid(acpi_trip)) {
> - passive_delay = tz->trips.passive.tsp * 100;
> + passive_delay = tz->trips.passive.delay;
>
> trip->type = THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE;
> trip->temperature = acpi_thermal_temp(tz, acpi_trip->temp_dk);
> --
So does the second patch in the series really depend on this one?
If not, I can apply it I think.
