On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 9:28 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:53 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Using struct gpio_chip is not safe as it will disappear if the > > underlying driver is unbound for any reason. Switch to using reference > > counted struct gpio_device and its dedicated accessors. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > As Andy points out add <linux/cleanup.h>, with that fixed: > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I think this can be merged into the gpio tree after leaving some > slack for the HTE maintainer to look at it, things look so much > better after this. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij Dipen, if you could give this patch a test and possibly ack it for me to take it through the GPIO tree (or go the immutable tag from HTE route) then it would be great. This is the last user of gpiochip_find() treewide, so with it we could remove it entirely for v6.7. Bart
